Frank Energy launches new ‘Same Energy, Probably Cheaper’ campaign via Motion Sickness
You get what you pay for. Mostly true for brunch and haircuts, not so much for the juice powering people’s appliances. Back with a new campaign through Motion Sickness, Frank Energy tests its cheaper power against premium priced providers and comes out… tied.
With a blinder of a past 12 months, Frank Energy continues to break new ground. Saving the superfluous analyticals – just one year on from Frank’s major rebrand (previously Energy Online) it’s seeing record growth month-on-month, and all time low churn rates. Now, the power player is keeping up the momentum with a fresh new brand platform, ‘Same Energy, Probably Cheaper’, ushered in by a series of hero films, and rolled out across TV, digital and social.
In a context of rising costs, Frank doubles down on its position as a champion against the perceived complexity of the category, without resorting to any sales incentives, proving that a compelling brand proposition can win in a category still plagued by short-term gimmicks.
Head of brand and marketing at Frank Energy, Michael Wood says NZ’s cost of living crisis drove the shift in campaign messaging: “With many Kiwi’s looking to tighten their belts this year, it was the perfect time to highlight our competitive pricing and remind people that cheaper power still keeps the lights on, so why pay more.”
Through a rigorous series of controlled experiments, Frank challenges the idea of perceived value in the energy sector. Testing power against power, Frank doubles down on its value position in market, and highlights that ‘premium vs budget’ really doesn’t make a difference when it comes to power.
The same electrons, wrapped up in a different package, with a different price tag.
Says Jordan Stent, creative director at Motion Sickness: “We were inspired by late nights of watching ‘Will it Blend’ – keen to pull Frank into the same liminal space as that Youtube black hole. A crew of specialist hair applicators, vibration consultants, fishmongers and dedicated toast technicians all did an incredible job at helping us blur the lines of reality. The climbers who claim there are only 14 peaks, have not yet seen ‘Toast Mountain’.”
Built in the husk of an abandoned University, the purpose designed ‘Testing Lab’ provided the backdrop to the domain, and continues to explore the ‘lore of Frank’. With all variables controlled, the tests reveal a cast of oddly identical subjects, undertaking common household power tests. It’s Consumer NZ on steroids, and Terry is still there to this day.
The results? Same energy. Probably cheaper.
Client – Frank Energy
Head of Brand & Marketing – Michael Wood
General Manager – Stephen Imm
Marketing Manager – Anuksha Narayan
Media – PHD
Agency/Production: Motion Sickness
Executive Creative Director – Sam Stuchbury
Creative Director – Jordan Stent
Head of Strategy – Hilary Ngan Kee
Senior Creative – Melina Fiolitakis
Art Director – Kelly France
Copywriter – Andrew Hathaway
Junior Creative – Jolin Lee
Junior Creative – Schumacher Leona
Head of Production – Joseph McAlpine
Senior Account Manager – Joe Fraei
Director – Ryan Heron
DOP – Dave Garbett
1st AD – Jonny Moffat
1st AC – Dave Steel
Gaffer – Blair Teesdale
Editors – Jolin Lee, Andy Deere & Pete Hansen
Production Designer – Dion Boothby
Music – Bigpop Studios
Colourist – Alina Bermingham
Sound Design – Liquid Studios
Animation – Moves
Costume Design – Kristen Seth
HMU – Jacqui Leung
Photographer – Simeon Patience
14 Comments
^
All cool except the second part line.
love it.
The dude in the logo suit! Makes no sense and all the sense
Respectfully, that’s a very creative way of stating absolutely nothing of value to the customer.
“Same energy probably cheaper” is not only confusing it doesn’t promise anything to the consumer. If they’ve got nothing worthwhile to offer, why bother advertising? People want real reasons to choose a service, and price is a major reason to do so given the ever increasing cost of energy.
Is anybody out there in the real world going to spend any of their precious time on this planet trying to decipher this mess?
Great positioning and just enough weird.
You think people will watch that and think. ‘Ah, they are only probably cheaper’
I don’t.
I think I’d you say anything about being cheap then the message is there
More than that. It’s not a shit energy ad like 95% of the rest of them. People want to be entertained not advertised to
Wishing you all the best on your first day of advertising.
You’re flattering me. Is it a brand ad or a product ad? What are the marketing objectives and how are they measured? Awareness, consideration? What’s the positioning? That you’re probably cheaper? Genius. Do you think this is commercial art and people are waiting impatiently to be entertained in a void of content?
It’s obviously a legal workaround. And ‘probably cheaper’ is a pretty good way around it, tbh.
Ah, those trustworthy energy providers, huh? Expecting us to simply buy their claim of being “probably cheaper.” What utter nonsense. If you’re truly more affordable, state it outright, make a commitment, and back it up. If not, find something else substantial to represent confidently as a brand. This approach appears amateurish strategically, frankly speaking.
The Aussies all cry because they take everything so seriously
Everyone who made these should be proud as punch. Love them. Very watchable. Love the line – clearly needed the ‘probably’ because the moment a competitor decides to offer a deal or bundle that is cheaper than Frank Energy, the campaign is redundant and legals are screwed.